Preview

Zhurnal Prikladnoii Spektroskopii

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Development and Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Methods for the Simultaneous Estimation of Sitagliptin and Gliclazide in Pharmaceutical Formulations: a Statistical Comparison Using ANOVA

Abstract

   This study describes the development and validation of two UV-visible spectrophotometric methods for the simultaneous quantification of sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate and gliclazide in fixed-dose pharmaceutical formulations. The combination, which was recently approved by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) in 2023, is used in the management of type 2 diabetes owing to its complementary pharmacological mechanisms and favorable safety profile. Spectrophotometry was selected as a simple, cost-effective yet reliable alternative to chromatographic techniques for routine quality-control analysis. Two methods – simultaneous equations and first derivatives – were developed using HPLC-grade methanol as a solvent and analyzed with a Shimadzu UV-1800 double-beam spectrophotometer. Method validation was conducted in accordance with International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Q2(R2) guidelines. The methods demonstrated excellent linearity across the concentration ranges of 8–56 μg/mL for sitagliptin and 4.8–33.4 μg/mL for gliclazide, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.999. Accuracy studies yielded recovery within acceptable limits, and precision was confirmed by low relative standard deviations. The first-order derivative method utilized zero-crossing wave-lengths of 213.2 nm (sitagliptin) and 243.6 nm (gliclazide), whereas the simultaneous-equation method used λmax values of 268.0 and 228.4 nm, respectively. Both methods showed high sensitivity (limit of detection, limit of quantitation), reproducibility, and robustness. Statistical comparison using one-way ANOVA revealed no significant difference (p > 0.05) compared with previously reported methods, confirming analytical equivalence. These validated methods are suitable for routine quality assessment and regulatory compliance of combined formulations, with future applicability in biological matrices.

About the Authors

M. Absher
Kerala University of Health Sciences
India

Grace College of Pharmacy; Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis

Kodunthirapully; Palakkad; Kerala



S. V. Kutty
Kerala University of Health Sciences
India

Grace College of Pharmacy; Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis

Kodunthirapully; Palakkad; Kerala



S. A. Surendran
Kerala University of Health Sciences
India

Grace College of Pharmacy; Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis

Kodunthirapully; Palakkad; Kerala



Y. Haribabu
Kerala University of Health Sciences
India

Grace College of Pharmacy; Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis

Kodunthirapully; Palakkad; Kerala



A. Hassanar
Kerala University of Health Sciences
India

Grace College of Pharmacy; Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis

Kodunthirapully; Palakkad; Kerala



A. Ashokan
Kerala University of Health Sciences
India

Grace College of Pharmacy; Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis

Kodunthirapully; Palakkad; Kerala



A. Aravind
Kerala University of Health Sciences
India

Grace College of Pharmacy; Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis

Kodunthirapully; Palakkad; Kerala



D. V. Santhosh
Kerala University of Health Sciences
India

Grace College of Pharmacy; Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis

Kodunthirapully; Palakkad; Kerala



References

1. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Care. American Diabetes Association, 33, No.1, 62–69 (2010), doi: 10.2337/dc10-S062.

2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Care. American Diabetes Association., 37, No. 1, 81–90 (2014), doi: 10.2337/dc14-S081.

3. C. Solis-Herrera, C. Triplitt, C. Reasner, Classification of Diabetes Mellitus, Endotext (2018), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279119.

4. R. Goyal, M. Singhal, I. Jialal, Type 2 Diabetes, Stat Pearls Publishing (2026) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513253.

5. A. Ramachandran, The Indian J. Med. Res., 140, No. 5, 579–581 (2014), https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4311308/.

6. C. R. Richardson, J. R. Borgeson, R. Van Harrison, Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Michigan Medicine University, Michigan (2021), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK579413/.

7. S. Bandgar, S. Bhavsar, G. Talele, Int. J. Novel Res. and Development, 10, No. 2, 580–590 (2025).

8. F. Ul Haq, A. Siraj, M. A. Ameer, T. Hamid, M. Rahman, S. Khan, S. Khan, S. Masud, J. Diabetes Mellitus, 11, No. 4, 115–131 (2021), doi: 10.4236/jdm.2021.114009.

9. B. Ahrén, J. J. Holst, H. Mårtensson, B. Balkan, Eur. J. Pharmacology (2000).

10. B. Ahrén, E. Simonsson, H. Larsson, M. Landin-Olsson, H. Torgeirsson, P. Jansson, M. Sandqvist, P. Båvenholm, S. Efendic, J. W. Eriksson, S. Dickinson, D. Holmes, Am. Diabetes Association, 25, No. 5, 869–875 (2002), doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.5.869.

11. K. Balamurugan, K. Mishra, R. Suresh, The Pharma Innovation, 7, No. 8, 357–361 (2018).

12. S. W. Lim, J. Z. Jin, L. Jin, J. Jin, C. Li, The Korean J. Int. Medicine, 30, No. 6, 759–770 (2015), doi: 10.3904/kjim.2015.30.6.759.

13. S. V. S. K. Kasina, K. M. Baradhi, Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (DPP IV) Inhibitors. Stat Pearls (2025), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542331/.

14. B. L. Furman, Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences (2016), doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.97990-X.

15. I. Sahin, O. Bakiner, T. Demir, R. Sari, A. Atmaca, Diabetes Therapy, 15, 1687–1716 (2024), doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01612-8.

16. British Pharmacopoeia, British Pharmacopoeia Commission, Monograph, 0675 (2007).

17. A. M. Fatmah, A. Omary, Profiles of Drug Substances, Excipients and Related Methodology, 42, 125–192 (2017), doi: 10.1016/bs.podrm.2017.02.003.

18. R. A. Costello, S. Nicolas, A. Shivkumar, Sulfonylureas, StatPearls (2023).

19. https://cdsco.gov.in/opencms/resources/UploadCDSCOWeb/2018/UploadApprovalMarketingFDC/FIXED%20DOSE%20COMBINATIONS%20APPROVED%20BY%20DCG(I)%20From%20January%202023%20to%20December%202023%20.pdf.

20. C. R. Reichal, M. G. Rao, Int. J. Pharm. and Pharm. Sci., 7, No. 6, 372–376 (2015).

21. C. R. Reichal, M. Sangeetha, N. Thirumoorthy, J. Chem. and Pharm. Res., 7, No. 5, 630–635 (2015).

22. P. Buchkul, S. Khante, N. D. Deshmukh, Indian J. Pharm. Educ. and Res., 58, 566–574 (2024), doi: 10.5530/ijper.58.2s.59.

23. R. Poornima, Shetty, D. D. Patil, J. Ass. Arab. Universities for Basic and Appl. Sci., 15, No. 1, 53–60 (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.jaubas.2013.05.005.

24. J. Chaudary, A. Jain, V. Saini, Int. Res. J. Pharm., 2, No. 12, 81–83 (2011).

25. A. J. Vyas, S. A. Jha, A. B. Patel, A. Patel, S. R. Shah, D. B. Sheth, Asian J. Pharm. Analysis, 12, No. 2, 149–156 (2022), doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2022.00026.

26. A. R. Rote, S. R. Bhalerao, Pharm. Methods, 2, No. 4, 260–263 (2011).

27. S. Patel, C. Aundhia, A. K. Sen, A. Zanwar, K. Pandya, Int. J. Pharm. Sci. and Res., 12, No. 4, 2296–2300 (2021), doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(4).2296-00.

28. J. Karpińska, Talanta, 64, No. 4, 802–822 (2004), doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2004.03.060.

29. C. B. Ojeda, F. S. Rojas, Anal. Chim. Acta, 518, No. 1-2, 1–24 (2004), doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2004.05.036.

30. K. Sahini, C. N. Nalini, Int. J. Creative Res. Thoughts, 8, No. 12, 1459–1464 (2020).

31. T. K. Kim, Korean J. Anesthesiology, 70, No. 1, 22–26 (2017), doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.1.22.

32. M. L. Gaddis, Acad. Emergency Medicine, 5, No. 3, 258–265 (1998), doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02624.x.

33. A. Ross, V. L. Willson, Basic and Adv. Stat. Tests, Sense Publishers, 21–24 (2017), doi: 10.1007/978-94-6351-086-8_5

34. R. M. Heiberger, E. Neuwirth, R Through Excel, Springer, 165–191 (2009).

35. T. Ramarao, K. Reshma, Eur. J. Biomed. and Pharm. Sci., 3, No. 10, 108–115 (2016).

36. R. L. Sawant, R. B. Kale, A. S. Ghodechor, A. B. Sherkar, K. R. Sanklecha, Asian J. Pharm. Analysis, 7, No. 3, 159–164 (2017), doi: 10.5958/2231-5675.2017.00025.4.

37. ICH, Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R2), ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline (2005).


Review

For citations:


Absher M., Kutty S.V., Surendran S.A., Haribabu Y., Hassanar A., Ashokan A., Aravind A., Santhosh D.V. Development and Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Methods for the Simultaneous Estimation of Sitagliptin and Gliclazide in Pharmaceutical Formulations: a Statistical Comparison Using ANOVA. Zhurnal Prikladnoii Spektroskopii. 2026;93(3):445 (1-12).

Views: 31

JATS XML

ISSN 0514-7506 (Print)