Preview

Zhurnal Prikladnoii Spektroskopii

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Resistance of Acetyl-, Formyl-, and Methoxy-Phenylboronic Acids to Boroxine Formation and their Employment in Fluoride Determination of Dental Formulations and Beverages by Fluorescence Quenching

Abstract

Phenyl boronic acids (PBAs) form stable complexes with fluoride. The effect of type (methoxy-, formyland acetyl-) and position (ortho-, meta- and para-) of electron-donating substitutions on the hydrolytic stability and acidity of PBAs, as well as their spectroscopic and physicochemical properties and their usage in spectrofluorimetric fluoride determination, were investigated. Thermal stabilities, relative predisposition and resistance to dehydroboronation of related PBA isomers were investigated in detail and compared with the use of thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry profiles. Dehydroboronation reaction leads to the synthesis of related new cyclic anhydric forms – specifically named boroxines – which are clearly distinguished by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. PBAs were used for the complexation of fluoride for spectrofluorimetric fluoride determination in dental formulations (toothpastes (TPs) and mouth rinses (MRs)) and beverages (mineral waters (MiWs)). Determination was done by fluorescence quenching of PBAs in response to increasing fluoride concentration. The regression equation was y = –15.336x+983.17 (R2 = 0.9931), and was linear in the 1.4-3.0-mM range. Determinations were performed with relative errors (%) in a range of –5.60 to +1.23, –2.01 to +5.69 and –4.16 to +2.54 for MRs, TPs and MiWs, respectively relative to fluoride levels of commercial samples. Chemometric analyses (cluster analysis, CA, principal component analysis, PCA) were performed on the same real samples. Raw fluorescence data was investigated by PCA to check their significance in chemometric discrimination. Dendograms and score plots successfully discriminated samples in related groups. This is the first demonstration of spectrofluorometric fluoride determination based on the quenching of related isomers of PBAs thus far, also the potential of raw fluorescence data of these PBAs for chemometric discrimination studies on related pharmaceutical samples was highlighted for the first time.

About the Author

E. Kilinc
Ege University
Turkey

Emrah Kilinc

Faculty of Pharmacy, Analytical Chemistry Department

Bornova Izmir



References

1. S. Pillitteri, P. Ranjan, E. V. Van der Eycken, U. K. Sharma, Adv. Synth. Catal., 364, 1643–1665 (2022), doi: 10.1002/adsc.202200204.

2. D. G. Hall, Chem. Soc. Rev., 48, 3475–3496 (2019), doi: 10.1039/c9cs00191c.

3. W. L. A. Brooks, B. S. Sumerlin, Chem. Rev., 116, 1375–1397 (2016), doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00300.

4. R. Wang, Z. Bian, D. Zhan, Z. Wu, Q. Yao, G. Zhang, Dyes Pigments, 185, 108885 (2021), doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108885.

5. M. P. Silva, L. Saraiva, M. Pinto, M. E. Sousa, Molecules, 25, 4323 (2020), doi: 10.3390/molecules25184323.

6. B. J. Graham, I. W. Windsor, B. Gold, R. T. Raines, PNAS, 118, e2013691118 (2021), doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013691118.

7. Y. Y. Aung, A. N. Kristanti, H. V. Lee, M. Z. Fahmi, ACS Omega, 6, 17750–17765 (2021), doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c01352.

8. D. Zarzeczanska, A. Adamczyk-Wozniak, A. Kulpa, T. Ossowski, A. Sporzynski, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 4493–4498 (2017), doi: 10.1002/ejic.201700546.

9. A. Adamczyk-Wozniak, E. Kaczorowska, J. Kredatusova, I. Madura, P. H. Marek, A. Matuszewska, A. Sporzynski, M. Uchman, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2018, 1492–1498 (2018), doi: 10.1002/ejic.201701485.

10. A. L. Korich, P. M. Iovine, Dalton Trans., 39, 1423–1431 (2010), doi: 10.1039/b917043j.

11. N. Dicesare, J. R. Lakowicz, Anal. Biochem., 301, 111–116 (2002), doi: 10.1006/abio.2001.5476.

12. R. Badugu, J. R. Lakowicz, C. D. Geddes, Sens. Actuators B Chem., 104, 103–110 (2005), doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2004.04.119.

13. K. M. K. Swamy, Y. J. Lee, H. N. Lee, J. Chun, Y. Kim, S. J. Kim, J. Yoon, J. Org. Chem., 71, 8626–8628 (2006), doi: 10.1021/jo061429x.

14. S. Arimori, M. G. Davidson, T. M. Fyles, T. G. Hibbert, T. D. James, G. I. Kociok-Köhn, Chem. Commun., 40, 1640–1641 (2004), doi: 10.1039/b404937c.

15. C. R. Cooper, N. Spencer, T. D. James, Chem. Commun., 24, 1365–1366 (1998), doi: 10.1039/A801693C.

16. J. M. Koskela, T. M. Fyles, T. D. James, Chem. Commun., 41, 945–947 (2005), doi: 10.1039/B415522J.

17. W. Tan, D. Zhang, D. Zhu, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 17, 2629–2633 (2007), doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.01.099.

18. J. K. Day, C. Bresner, N. D. Coombs, I. A. Fallis, L. L. Ooi, S. Aldridge, Inorg. Chem., 47, 793–804 (2008), doi: 10.1021/ic701494p.

19. M. Nicolas, B. Fabre, J. Simonet, Electrochim. Acta, 46, 1179–1190 (2001), doi: 10.1016/S0013- 4686(00)00694-0.

20. M. Nicolas, B. Fabre, J. Simonet, Chem. Commun., 25, 1881–1882 (1999), doi: 10.1039/A905136H.

21. S. Sole, F.P. Gabbai, Chem. Commun., 40, 1284–1285 (2004), doi: 10.1039/B403596H.

22. M. Melami, S. Solé, C. W. Chiu, H. Wang, F. P. Gabbai, Inorg. Chem., 45, 8136–8143 (2006), doi: 10.1021/ic060709s.

23. W. Tan, D. Zhang, Z. Wang, C. Liu, D. Zhu, J. Mater. Chem., 17, 1964–1968 (2007), doi: 10.1039/b618183j.

24. S. Yamaguchi, S. Akiyama, K. Tamao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 11372–11375 (2001). doi:10.1021/ja015957w.

25. Y. Sert, F. Ucun, M. Boyukata, Indian J. Phys., 87, 113–119 (2013), doi: 10.1007/s12648-012-0202-3.

26. O. Alver, G. Dikmen, J. Mol. Struct., 1108, 103–111 (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2015.11.041.

27. C. Liao, M. C. Nicklaus, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 49, 2801–2812 (2009), doi: 10.1021/ci900289x.

28. C. Dardonville, Drug Discov., 27, 49–58 (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2018.04.001.

29. K. Mioduszewska, J. Dolzonek, D. Wyrzykowski, L. Kubik, P. Wiczling, C. Sikorska, M. Tonski, Z. Kaczynski, P. Stepnowski, A. Bialk-Bielinska, Trend. Anal. Chem., 97, 283–296 (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2017.09.009.

30. W. A. Marinaro, L. J. Schieber, E. J. Munson, V. W. Day, V. J. Stella, J. Pharm. Sci., 101, 310–318 (2012), doi: 10.1002/jps.23207.

31. C. Liu, Q. Yin, X. Li, L. Hao, W. Zhang, Y. Bao, J. Ma, Adv. Comp. Hyb. Mater., 4, 138–149 (2021), doi: 10.1007/s42114-021-00206-3.

32. A. Adamczyk-Wozniak, M.K. Cyranski, K. Durka, J.T. Gozdalik, P. Klimentowska, R. Rusiecki, A. Sporzynski, D. Zarzeczanska, Crystal., 9, 109–125 (2019), doi: 10.3390/cryst9020109.

33. F. G. Der, G. Yalcin, E. Ozcan Bulbul, H. İleri, B. Cihan, M. Gokcan, Y. C. Esitmez, E. Kilinc, Electroanal., 34, 1711–1734 (2022), doi: 10.1002/elan.202200012.


Review

For citations:


Kilinc E. Resistance of Acetyl-, Formyl-, and Methoxy-Phenylboronic Acids to Boroxine Formation and their Employment in Fluoride Determination of Dental Formulations and Beverages by Fluorescence Quenching. Zhurnal Prikladnoii Spektroskopii. 2023;90(6):969.

Views: 155


ISSN 0514-7506 (Print)