Preview

Zhurnal Prikladnoii Spektroskopii

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Development and Validation of an Eco-Friendly UV-Visible Spectrophotometric Method for Quantitative Estimation of Catechin Hydrate in Bulk Using Ethanol as a Green Solvent: a Sustainable Approach for Low-Income Country Settings

Abstract

A cost-effective, environmentally friendly UV-visible spectrophotometric method for the quantitative determination of catechin hydrate in pure form using hydroalcoholic solution of 0.01% (v/v) ethanol has been developed and validated. The aim of the study was to develop a sustainable analytical instrument for use in quality control purposes in resource-poor environments. The method was validated as per ICH guidelines, and different validation parameters such as linearity, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and robustness were investigated. It is found that the method possesses good linearity over the range of 2–20 µg/mL with R2 = 0.9976 and λmax = 278 nm. Good accuracy of the method was obtained by means of recovery experiments, as percentage recovery values varied between 99.39 and 99.48%. Precision of the method was ensured through an acceptable percentage relative standard deviation (%RSD). The LOD and LOQ values for catechin hydrate were determined to be 0.523 and 1.585 µg/mL, respectively. The solubility of catechin hydrate in the solvent system was 114.631 µg/mL, as tested. Environmentally, the overall sustainability of this method, as measured by the Analytical Greenness (AGREE) tool, scored 0.84, and it was highly aligned with the principles of green analytical chemistry. In general, the method proposed is suitable for routine pharmaceutical and nutraceutical quality control analysis.

About the Authors

Astha Singh
Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh
India

Noida, U.P.



Somesh Narayan Rai
Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh
India

Noida, U.P.



Kalpana Nagpal
Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh
India

Noida, U.P.



References

1. M. Chem, A. Samanta, B. Bandyopadhyay, N. Das, Med. Chem. (Los Angeles), An Open Access J., 6, No. 6, 399 (2016).

2. S. L. Yan, Q. Z. Wang, G. H. Peng, Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr., 60, No. 5, 432–438 (2009).

3. S. Wangkarn, K. Grudpan, C. Khanongnuch, T. Pattananandecha, S. Apichai, C. Saenjum, Molecules, 26, No. 19, 6052 (2021).

4. B. Bai, D. Shen, S. Meng, Y. Guo, B. Feng, T. Bo, et al., Molecules, 29, No. 10, 2344 (2024).

5. X. Miao, Y. Zhao, P. Luo, D. Ye, C. Xie, L. Tang, et al., J. Food Biochem., No. 1, 1214060 (2025).

6. S. M. Tahari, A. Larki, M. Shakourian-Fard, G. Kamath, Microchem. J., 208, 112512 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2024.112512

7. J. A. Custodio-Mendoza, P. Pokorski, H. Aktaş, et al., J. Sep. Sci., 47, e202400142 (2024).

8. P. Svoboda, H. Vlčková, L. Nováková, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 114, 62–70 (2015).

9. D. Zhao, B. Yuan, E. Carry, G. M. Pasinetti, L. Ho, J. Faith, et al., J. Chromatogr. B: Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci., 1099, 34–45 (2018).

10. J. Cuevas-Valenzuela, Á. González-Rojas, J. Wisniak, A. Apelblat, J. R. Pérez-Correa, Fluid Phase Equilib., 382, 279–285 (2014). 728-9

11. O. Yu. Maslov, M. A. Komisarenko, Y. S. Kolisnyk, T. A. Kostina, J. Org. Pharm. Chem., 19, No. 3, 28–33 (2021).

12. Anmol, S. Thakur, A. Bhardwaj, S. Awasthi, A. Shrivastav, P. Kumar, M. Sharma, U. Sharma, J. Food Compos. Anal., 153, 109031 (2026).'

13. E. Sholichah, D. Desnilasari, M. A. Karim, A. Putra, B. Purwono, AIP Conf. Proc., 2493, No. 1 (2022).

14. M. Kumar, Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Med., 2, No. 4, 94–101 (2024).

15. T. Marew, A. Belete, F. J. Richmond, T. Gebre-Mariam, Ther. Innov. Regul. Sci., 59, No. 2, 379–396 (2025).'

16. D. G. Mohamed, M. M. Abdelrahman, A. B. Ahmed, M. A. Magdy, Sci. Rep., 16, 9687 (2026).

17. K. Komal Pawar, Syed Shoaib Ali, Chetan M. Jain, Karna B. Khavane, GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sci., 32, No. 1, 1–6 (2025).

18. K. Malhotra, K. Nagpal, J. Appl. Spectrosc., 92, No. 4, 897–906 (2025).

19. S. Dixit, K. Aggarwal, K. Nagpal, J. Appl. Spectrosc., 92, No. 1, 183–190 (2025).

20. N. Srivastava, A. Bansal, K. Aggarwal, K. Nagpal, J. Appl. Spectrosc., 91, No. 3, 700–708 (2024).

21. A. Bansal, N. Srivastava, K. Nagpal, J. Appl. Spectrosc., 89, No. 1, 150–158 (2022).

22. F. Pena-Pereira, W. Wojnowski, M. Tobiszewski, Anal. Chem., 92, No. 14, 10076–10082 (2020).

23. A. Gałuszka, Z. Migaszewski, J. Namieśnik, TrAC – Trends Analytical Chemistry, 50, 78–84 (2013).

24. C. J. Clarke, W. C. Tu, O. Levers, A. Bröhl, J. P. Hallett, Chem Rev., 118, No. 2, 747–800 (2018).

25. P. Muthulingam, D. G. Popovich, P. A. N. Punyasiri, C. M. Nanayakkara, C. H. Mesarich, A. Rashidinejad, J. Food Compos. Anal., 148, 108330 (2025).


Review

For citations:


Singh A., Rai S., Nagpal K. Development and Validation of an Eco-Friendly UV-Visible Spectrophotometric Method for Quantitative Estimation of Catechin Hydrate in Bulk Using Ethanol as a Green Solvent: a Sustainable Approach for Low-Income Country Settings. Zhurnal Prikladnoii Spektroskopii. 2026;93(5):728.

Views: 1

JATS XML

ISSN 0514-7506 (Print)