INTERCALIBRATION OF SATELLITE AND GROUND-BASED MEASUREMENTS OF CO2 MEAN MOLE FRACTIONS AT THE NDACC SITE St. Petersburg
Abstract
We compared ground-based (Bruker 125 HR) and satellite (OCO-2) datasets of simultaneous CO2 measurements in the vicinity of St. Petersburg. It is shown that correcting the ground-based XCO2 values by 2.5% and choosing an optimal setup during the spectra analysis allowed us to reach good agreement between the satellite and ground-based measurements. The bias between the two datasets is –0.01—0.16 ppm (–0.00—0.04%) for the means, and the standard deviation of the means is 1.42—1.49 ppm (0.35—0.37%) with a spatial mismatch of XCO2 data pairs of 100—300 km. Such small disagreement between the two types of measurements permits to use both methods for solving the inverse task of atmospheric transfer — the estimation of anthropogenic emissions of CO2.
About the Authors
Ya. A. Virolainen
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg, 199034
Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg, 199034
A. A. Nikitenko
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg, 199034
Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg, 199034
Yu. M. Timofeyev
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg, 199034
Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg, 199034
References
1. T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, P.M. Midgley. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013): https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/WG1AR5_SummaryVolume_FINAL.pdf
2. National Institute for Environmental Studies report. A guidebook on the use of satellite greenhouse gases observation data to evaluate and improve greenhouse gas emission inventories (2018): https://www.nies.go.jp/soc/doc/GHG_Satellite_Guidebook_1st_12d.pdf
3. Committee on Earth Observing Satellites (CEOS) report. A constellation architecture for monitoring carbon dioxide and methane from space (2018): http://ceos.org/document_management/Virtual_Constellations/ACC/Documents/CEOS_AC-VC_GHG_White_Paper_Version_1_20181009.pdf
4. H. Bovensmann, M. Buchwitz, J. P. Burrows, M. Reuter, T. Krings, K. Gerilowski, O. Schneising, J. Heymann, A. Tretner, J. Erzinger. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, N 4 (2010) 781—811
5. P. Fu, Y. Xie, C. E. Moore, S. W. Myint, C. J. Bernacchi. Earths Future, 7, N 9 (2019) 1058—1070
6. D. Wunch, P. O. Wennberg, G. Osterman, B. Fisher, B. Naylor, C. M. Roehl, C. ODell, L. Mandrake, C. Viatte, D. W. Griffith, N. M. Deutscher, V. A. Velazco, J. Notholt, T. Warneke, C. Petri, M. de Maziére, M. K. Sha, R. Sussmann, M. Rettinger, D. Pollard, J. Robinson, I. Morino, O. Uchino, F. Hase, T. Blumenstock, M. Kiel, D. G. Feist, S. G. Arnold, K. Strong, J. Mendonca, R. Kivi, P. Heikkinen, L. Iraci, J. Podolske, P. W. Hillyard, S. Kawakami, M. K. Dubey, H. A. Parker, E. Sepulveda, O. E. G. Rodriguez, Y. Te, P. Jeseck, M. R. Gunson, D. Crisp, A. Eldering. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, N 6 (2017) 2209—2238
7. Наблюдательная сеть TCCON: https://tccon-wiki.caltech.edu/
8. Наблюдательная сеть IRWG/NDACC: https://www2.acom.ucar.edu/irwg
9. S. Barthlott, M. Schneider, F. Hase, A. Wiegele, E. Christner, Y. González, T. Blumenstock, S. Dohe, O. E. García, E. Sepúlveda, K. Strong, J. Mendonca, D. Weaver, M. Palm, N. M. Deutscher, T. Warneke, J, Notholt, B. Lejeune, E. Mahieu, N. Jones, D. W. T. Griffith, V. A. Velazco, D. Smale, J. Robinson, R. Kivi, P. Heikkinen, U. Raffalski. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, N 3 (2015) 1555—1573
10. Ю. М. Тимофеев, И. А. Березин, Я. А. Виролайнен, М. В. Макарова, А. В. Поляков, А. В. Поберовский, Н. Н. Филиппов, С. Ч. Фока. Изв. РАН ФАО, 55, № 1 (2019) 65—72 [Yu. M. Timofeyev, I. A. Berezin, Ya. A., Virolainen, M. V. Makarova, A. V. Polyakov, A. V. Poberovsky, S. Ch. Foka. Izv. Atm. and Ocean. Phys., 55, N 1 (2019) 59—64]
11. Y. Timofeyev, Y. Virolainen, M. Makarova, A. Poberovsky, A. Polyakov, D. Ionov, S. Osipov, H. Imhasin. J. Mol. Spectr., 323 (2016) 2—14
12. F. Hase, J. W. Hannigan, M. T. Coffey, A. Goldman, M. Höpfner, N. B. Jones, C. P. Rinsland, S. W. Wood. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 87 (2004) 25—52
13. Я. А. Виролайнен. Журн. прикл. спектр., 85, № 3 (2018) 453–460 [Ya. A. Virolainen. J. Appl. Spectr., 85, N 3 (2018) 462—469]
14. База данных OCO-2 по СО2 https://co2.jpl.nasa.gov/download/?dataset=OCO2LtCO2v9&product=LITE
15. Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) Data Product User’s Guide https://docserver.gesdisc.eosdis.nasa.gov/public/project/OCO/OCO2_DUG.V9.pdf
16. Г. М. Неробелов, Ю. М. Тимофеев, С. П. Смышляев, Я. А. Виролайнен, М. В. Макарова, С. Ч. Фока. Опт. атм. и океана, 33, № 10 (2020) (в печати)
17. М. В. Макарова, А. В. Поберовский, Ф. Хазе, Ю. М. Тимофеев, Х. Х. Имхасин. Журн. прикл. спектр., 83, № 3 (2016) 437—444 [M. V. Makarova, A. V. Poberovskii, F. Hase, Yu. Timofeyev, Kh. Kh. Imhasin. J. Appl. Spectr., 83, N 3 (2016) 429—436]
Review
For citations:
Virolainen Ya.A., Nikitenko A.A., Timofeyev Yu.M. INTERCALIBRATION OF SATELLITE AND GROUND-BASED MEASUREMENTS OF CO2 MEAN MOLE FRACTIONS AT THE NDACC SITE St. Petersburg. Zhurnal Prikladnoii Spektroskopii. 2020;87(5):816-820. (In Russ.)
Views: 241
Email this article 